linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 7/9] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: add DT clock "cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 08:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elinor Montmasson <elinor.montmasson@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	shengjiu wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>, 
	Xiubo Lee <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, 
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
	linux-sound <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, 
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, 
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 7/9] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: add DT clock "cpu_sysclk"
 with generic codec

From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Sent: Friday, 17 May, 2024 13:17:20
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:05:35AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote:
>> From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
>> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Elinor Montmasson wrote:
> 
>> >> +		struct clk *cpu_sysclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "cpu_sysclk");
>> >> +		if (!IS_ERR(cpu_sysclk)) {
>> >> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(cpu_sysclk);
>> >> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX];
>> >> +			clk_put(cpu_sysclk);
>> >> +		}
> 
>> > I don't really understand the goal here - this is just reading whatever
>> > frequency happens to be set in the hardware when the driver starts up
>> > which if nothing else seems rather fragile?
> 
>> The driver allow to set the sysclk frequency
>> of the CPU DAI through `priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq` when calling
>> `fsl_asoc_card_hw_params()`.
>> Currently it is hard-coded per use-case in the driver.
> 
>> My reasoning was that with a generic codec/compatible, there might
>> be use-cases needing to use this parameter, so I exposed it here via DT.
> 
>> Is it a bad idea to expose this parameter ? This is not a requirement for the
>> driver to work, most of the current compatibles do not use this parameter.
>> It is currently used only for `fsl,imx-audio-cs42888`.
>> In that case I can remove this commit.
> 
> I'm having a hard time connecting your reply here with my comment.  This
> isn't as far as I can see allowing the frequency to be explicitly
> configured, it's just using whatever value happens to be programmed in
> the clock when the driver starts.

In v3 I used parameters `cpu-sysclk-freq-rx/tx` to explicitly
set the frequency.
In its review Rob Herring said that the clock bindings should
be used, so that's why I changed it to use this `cpu_sysclk` clock.