linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible for generic codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 08:48:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elinor Montmasson <elinor.montmasson@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	shengjiu wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>, 
	Xiubo Lee <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, 
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
	linux-sound <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, 
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, 
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible
 for generic codec

From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Sent: Friday, 17 May, 2024 13:11:43
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:05:41AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote:
>> From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
> 
>> > This description (and the code) don't feel like they're actually generic
>> > - they're clearly specific to the bidrectional S/PDIF case.  I'd expect
>> > something called -generic to cope with single CODECs as well as double,
>> > and not to have any constraints on what those are.
> 
>> I proposed, in an reply of the v3 patch series to Krzysztof Kozlowski,
>> the compatible "fsl,imx-audio-no-codec" instead of "generic".
>> Krzysztof thought it was too generic, but it would convey more clearly
>> that it is for cases without codec driver.
>> Would this other compatible string be more appropriate ?
> 
> No.  There is very clearly a CODEC here, it physically exists, we can
> point at it on the board and it has a software representation.  Your
> code is also very specific to the two CODEC case.

Then maybe it's not be a good idea to make this compatible generic
for this contribution.
The original intention is to bring support for the S/PDIF,
so maybe the contribution should focus on this use case?
In that case, would changing the compatible for "fsl,imx-audio-spdif-card"
be acceptable?
"fsl,imx-audio-spdif" is already used for the `imx-spdif.c`
which does not use the ASRC.