linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/14] x86/alternatives: Add nested alternatives macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240531143625.GHZlngaQfx6CiJlujI@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 16:36:25 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] x86/alternatives: Add nested alternatives macros

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:30:31PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please don't resurrect the %P modifier, use %c instead.

Btw, out of curiosity, is %P being phased out?

I'm looking at

41cd2e1ee96e ("x86/asm: Use %c/%n instead of %P operand modifier in asm templates")

and yeah, %c is the generic one while %P is the x86-specific one but
phasing latter out is probably going to take a bunch of gcc releases...

Or is it something else entirely?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette