[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ed9goqvp.fsf@metaspace.dk>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:15:54 +0200
From: Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith
Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Bart Van
Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Ming Lei
<ming.lei@...hat.com>, "linux-block@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Matthew Wilcox
<willy@...radead.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn
Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>, Luis Chamberlain
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, Yexuan Yang <1182282462@...t.edu.cn>, Sergio
González Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>, Joel
Granados
<j.granados@...sung.com>, "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)"
<kernel@...kajraghav.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, Niklas
Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>, Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Johannes Thumshirn
<Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>, Matias Bjørling
<m@...rling.me>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org"
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "gost.dev@...sung.com"
<gost.dev@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] rust: block: add rnull, Rust null_blk
implementation
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me> writes:
>> +impl kernel::Module for NullBlkModule {
>> + fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self> {
>> + pr_info!("Rust null_blk loaded\n");
>> + let tagset = Arc::pin_init(TagSet::try_new(1, 256, 1), flags::GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +
>> + let disk = {
>> + let block_size: u16 = 4096;
>> + if block_size % 512 != 0 || !(512..=4096).contains(&block_size) {
>> + return Err(kernel::error::code::EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + let mut disk = gen_disk::GenDisk::try_new(tagset)?;
>> + disk.set_name(format_args!("rnullb{}", 0))?;
>> + disk.set_capacity_sectors(4096 << 11);
>> + disk.set_queue_logical_block_size(block_size.into());
>> + disk.set_queue_physical_block_size(block_size.into());
>> + disk.set_rotational(false);
>> + disk.add()
>> + }?;
>
> Personally, I would prefer to put the `?` into the line above.
I have no strong opinion here.
>
>> +
>> + let disk = Box::pin_init(new_mutex!(disk, "nullb:disk"), flags::GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +
>> + Ok(Self { _disk: disk })
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct NullBlkDevice;
>> +
>> +#[vtable]
>> +impl Operations for NullBlkDevice {
>> + #[inline(always)]
>> + fn queue_rq(rq: ARef<mq::Request<Self>>, _is_last: bool) -> Result {
>> + mq::Request::end_ok(rq)
>> + .map_err(|_e| kernel::error::code::EIO)
>> + .expect("Fatal error - expected to be able to end request");
>
> I expected something more along the lines of: "expected to be able to
> end request, since `NullBlkDevice` never takes refcounts on Requests and
> as such the ARef must be unique, but `end_ok` only fails if that is not
> the case". But maybe that would fit better in a comment, what do you
> think?
I can add a comment 👍
BR Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists