[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2406012326580.23854@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:30:03 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] MIPS: csrc-r4k: Select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK if
64BIT
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> csrc-r4k suffers from SMP synchronization overhead.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> index f1aa1bf11166..fa8ca0287568 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> @@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ config CSRC_IOASIC
>
> config CSRC_R4K
> select CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG if CPU_FREQ
> + select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK if 64BIT
Shouldn't it be:
select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK if 64BIT && SMP
then?
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists