[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240602103727.007e34d6@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:37:27 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>, Esteban Blanc
<eblanc@...libre.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] iio: add support for multiple scan types
On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:27:26 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:25:17 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 May 2024 10:14:07 -0500
> > David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Up to now, the IIO subsystem has only supported a single scan type per
> > > channel. This scan type determines the binary format of the data in the
> > > buffer when doing buffered reads.
> > >
> > > For simple devices, there is only one scan type and all is well. But
> > > for more complex devices, there may be multiple scan types. For example,
> > > ADCs with a resolution boost feature that adds more bits to the raw
> > > sample data. Traditionally, for slow devices, we've just always used the
> > > highest resolution mode, but for high performance ADCs, this may not be
> > > always practical. Manipulating data after every read can hurt performance
> > > and in the case of hardware buffers, it may not be possible to change the
> > > format of the data in the buffer at all. There are also ADCs where
> > > enabling the higher resolution can only be done if oversampling is also
> > > enabled which may not be desireable.
> > >
> > > To allow for more flexibility, we would like to add support for multiple
> > > scan types per channel.
> > >
> > > To avoid having to touch every driver, we implemented this in a way that
> > > preserves the existing scan_type field. See the "iio: add support for
> > > multiple scan types per channel" the details. The first couple of patches
> > > are just preparation for this.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAMknhBHOXaff__QyU-wFSNNENvs23vDX5n_ddH-Dw3s6-sQ9sg@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Nice series. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as
> > testing for 0-day to poke at it.
> >
> > Obviously this v3 hasn't been on list that long, but there is still time
> > as I doubt I'll push out a non rebasing tree for a week or so.
> > This week is looking too busy!
>
> oops. Goes to show I'm not keeping track of things very well today.
> I haven't applied the driver this updates yet.
>
> I'll look at that now and hopefully I can pick them both up.
>
That was fine, so both now applied.
> Jonathan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists