[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a366a29b-3657-47c3-925c-5dbc6bcdf2e5@luigi311.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:20:42 -0600
From: Luis Garcia <git@...gi311.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com,
jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/25] dt-bindings: media: imx258: Add binding for
powerdown-gpio
On 5/20/24 06:50, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:31:35AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 09:24:38AM -0600, git@...gi311.com wrote:
>>> From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>>>
>>> Add powerdown-gpio binding as it is required for some boards.
>>
>> I thought the conclusion was that this wasn't a property of the sensor? If
>> it needs to be controlled, then this should take place somewhere else than
>> in the sensor driver.
>
> I'll take patches up to the previous and then 24 and 25 from this version.
> The rest will need some rework.
>
Last time i looked at the comments for these two patch discussion was still
going on so i was submitting fixes for the other patches while this continued.
Looks like the final consensuses is for these two to be dropped so I just
submitted v6 with them both dropped. I also tested it on my PPP and it still
continues to work as expected just like it did before. Take a look at v6 and
let me know what else requires rework on there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists