linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v10 0/8] TPEBS counting mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:18:16 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: "Wang, Weilin" <weilin.wang@...el.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Taylor, Perry" <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
	"Alt, Samantha" <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
	"Biggers, Caleb" <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 0/8] TPEBS counting mode support

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:03:25PM +0000, Wang, Weilin wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > As I said, please don't open event1:R (for perf stat) and let tpebs_stop() set
> > the value using the data from perf record in background.
> 
> I think this is exactly what I'm trying to achieve, not open event1:R for perf stat. 
> The problem is that I'm not sure how to do it properly in the code. Please give 
> me some suggestion here. 

Ok, I think the problem is in the read code.  It requires the number of
entries and the data size to match with what it calculates from the
member events.  It should not count TPEBS events as we don't want to
open them.

Something like below might work (on top of your series).  Probably
libperf should be aware of this..

Thanks,
Namhyung

---8<---

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index ac7a98ff6b19..7913db4a99e0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -1559,6 +1559,60 @@ static void evsel__set_count(struct evsel *counter, int cpu_map_idx, int thread,
 	perf_counts__set_loaded(counter->counts, cpu_map_idx, thread, true);
 }
 
+static bool evsel__group_has_tpebs(struct evsel *leader)
+{
+	struct evsel *evsel;
+
+	for_each_group_evsel(evsel, leader) {
+		if (evsel__is_retire_lat(evsel))
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
+static u64 evsel__group_read_nr_members(struct evsel *leader)
+{
+	u64 nr = leader->core.nr_members;
+	struct evsel *evsel;
+
+	for_each_group_evsel(evsel, leader) {
+		if (evsel__is_retire_lat(evsel))
+			nr--;
+	}
+	return nr;
+}
+
+static u64 evsel__group_read_size(struct evsel *leader)
+{
+	u64 read_format = leader->core.attr.read_format;
+	int entry = sizeof(u64); /* value */
+	int size = 0;
+	int nr = 1;
+
+	if (!evsel__group_has_tpebs(leader))
+		return perf_evsel__read_size(&leader->core);
+
+	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
+		size += sizeof(u64);
+
+	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
+		size += sizeof(u64);
+
+	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
+		entry += sizeof(u64);
+
+	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_LOST)
+		entry += sizeof(u64);
+
+	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP) {
+		nr = evsel__group_read_nr_members(leader);
+		size += sizeof(u64);
+	}
+
+	size += entry * nr;
+	return size;
+}
+
 static int evsel__process_group_data(struct evsel *leader, int cpu_map_idx, int thread, u64 *data)
 {
 	u64 read_format = leader->core.attr.read_format;
@@ -1567,7 +1621,7 @@ static int evsel__process_group_data(struct evsel *leader, int cpu_map_idx, int
 
 	nr = *data++;
 
-	if (nr != (u64) leader->core.nr_members)
+	if (nr != evsel__group_read_nr_members(leader))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
@@ -1597,7 +1651,7 @@ static int evsel__read_group(struct evsel *leader, int cpu_map_idx, int thread)
 {
 	struct perf_stat_evsel *ps = leader->stats;
 	u64 read_format = leader->core.attr.read_format;
-	int size = perf_evsel__read_size(&leader->core);
+	int size = evsel__group_read_size(leader);
 	u64 *data = ps->group_data;
 
 	if (!(read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID))
@@ -2210,8 +2264,7 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
 
 	if (evsel__is_retire_lat(evsel)) {
 		err = tpebs_start(evsel->evlist, cpus);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	err = __evsel__prepare_open(evsel, cpus, threads);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-tpebs.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-tpebs.c
index d099fc8080e1..a3857e88af96 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-tpebs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-tpebs.c
@@ -354,10 +354,11 @@ int tpebs_set_evsel(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx, int thread)
 	 */
 	if (cpu_map_idx == 0 && thread == 0) {
 	/* Lost precision when casting from double to __u64. Any improvement? */
-		val = t->val;
+		val = t->val * 1000;
 	} else
 		val = 0;
 
+	evsel->scale = 1e-3;
 	count->val = val;
 	return 0;
 }