[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171730042588.665897.15541828738842172518.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:53:42 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 00/14] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,gcc: handle the controllers without power domains
On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:46:58 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On some of the Qualcomm platforms the Global Clock Controller doesn't
> provide power domains to the platform. However the existing
> qcom,gcc.yaml common schema requires the '#power-domain-cells' property.
> This results either in a platforms having incorrect property or in DT
> validation errors. Fix this by splitting the qcom,gcc-nopd.yaml schema,
> which doesn't define the offensive property and use it for such
> platforms.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[10/14] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: drop #power-domain-cells property of GCC
commit: d1caecddf9f4bb17db10c8a46083a70688d0f46d
[11/14] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: drop #power-domain-cells property of GCC
commit: 2ad7dd5479c04026f8421f12baf7a2b482cf0bff
[12/14] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: drop #power-domain-cells property of GCC
commit: ef3308cf52553522d619a858a72a68f82432865b
[13/14] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: fix GCC node name
commit: 6c2e3ca212dd57678fbd38d66d63a0dcab45e81a
[14/14] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: fix GCC node name
commit: a884986eb2f79b71a4d50fa1b8e205f1f00d9514
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists