linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Add suspend to ram support for PCIe on J7200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MftX7Sk5OknNhGrZuT1f+w496+jD3pX4LN014L_ojUtqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:33:50 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, 
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, 
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, 
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, 
	theo.lebrun@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, 
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Add suspend to ram support for PCIe on J7200

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:55 PM Thomas Richard
<thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/15/24 12:01, Thomas Richard wrote:
> > This adds suspend to ram support for the PCIe (RC mode) on J7200 platform.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> Gentle ping.
> No merge conflict with 6.10-rc1.
> I know the patch for the gpio-pca953x driver causes a regression for one
> other platform.
> But most of the patches could be applied.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Thomas
>

If the patches targeting different subsystems don't depend on each
other then you'd have more chance of getting them picked up by
splitting the series up and sending individual bits and pieces to
appropriate maintainers separately.

Bart