[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240603083754.GAZl2A4uXvVB5w4l9u@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:37:54 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ardb@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
bhe@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, hpa@...or.com,
jun.nakajima@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ltao@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rafael@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11.1 11/19] x86/tdx: Convert shared memory back to
private on kexec
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 05:23:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> + /*
> + * The only thing one can do at this point on failure
> + * is panic. It is reasonable to proceed.
It makes even less sense now: panic() means "all stops and we die" and
you say it is reasonable to proceed.
I'm confused.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists