[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGudoHEe=AiRpkyLJTZzU8MtiGC86Kivbyi1xF-Hh0hGJKWhCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:52:18 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>,
Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, ojeda@...nel.org,
danny@...ag0n.dev, mic@...ikod.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joe@...ches.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add .editorconfig file for basic formatting
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 2:18 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 05:30:51PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> > As is I think the config mostly gets in the way and most people have a
> > setup which does not use it (for example my vim does not). Alternatively
> > maye it is neovim which is overzalous here and other editors don't treat
> > the entire file. If there is a way to convince the thing to only tend to
> > whitespace issues in edited lines that would be great.
>
> Yes, I think that is quite overzealous, I'd view it as a vim issue.
>
I don't know about vim specifically, it was neovim here, for the record.
Anyhow I put on latex gloves and typed in "apt install emacs", added
the plugin as documented on github
(https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig-emacs + entries to
.emacs.d/init.el) and got precisely the same behavior.
There is no way I'm trying to other editors.
At this point I suspect this *is* the intended behavior and other
people don't run into it because their editor does not look at
.editorconfig to begin with.
Note my vim does not either, I only ran into it after experimenting with neovim.
--
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists