linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-next v4] arm32: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:55:09 +0800
From: "liuyuntao (F)" <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>, Linus
 Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <afd@...com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	<corbet@....net>, <rppt@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v4] arm32: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

Gentle ping

On 2024/3/20 1:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 03:44, Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The current arm32 architecture does not yet support the
>> HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION feature. arm32 is widely used in
>> embedded scenarios, and enabling this feature would be beneficial for
>> reducing the size of the kernel image.
>>
>> In order to make this work, we keep the necessary tables by annotating
>> them with KEEP, also it requires further changes to linker script to KEEP
>> some tables and wildcard compiler generated sections into the right place.
>> When using ld.lld for linking, KEEP is not recognized within the OVERLAY
>> command, and Ard proposed a concise method to solve this problem.
>>
>> It boots normally with defconfig, vexpress_defconfig and tinyconfig.
>>
>> The size comparison of zImage is as follows:
>> defconfig       vexpress_defconfig      tinyconfig
>> 5137712         5138024                 424192          no dce
>> 5032560         4997824                 298384          dce
>> 2.0%            2.7%                    29.7%           shrink
>>
>> When using smaller config file, there is a significant reduction in the
>> size of the zImage.
>>
>> We also tested this patch on a commercially available single-board
>> computer, and the comparison is as follows:
>> a15eb_config
>> 2161384         no dce
>> 2092240         dce
>> 3.2%            shrink
>>
>> The zImage size has been reduced by approximately 3.2%, which is 70KB on
>> 2.1M.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
>> Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>