[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240603133550.GA21513@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:35:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] iommu: Refactoring domain allocation interface
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:02:12PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c: pd->domain = domain
> > > = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > >
> > > This series leave those cases unchanged and keep iommu_domain_alloc()
> > > for their usage. But new drivers should not use it anymore.
> >
> > does it mean there is still domains allocated via iommu_domain_alloc()
> > on VT-d platform?
>
> I think the drivers mentioned above do not run on x86 platforms, or do
> they?
usnic does.. What was preventing converting it?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists