linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tick: shift tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() from tick_check_oneshot_change() to hrtimer_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240603134100.GA388@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:41:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tick: shift tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() from
 tick_check_oneshot_change() to hrtimer_run_queues()

On 06/03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 02 2024 at 12:20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -1891,8 +1891,11 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
> >  	 * there only sets the check bit in the tick_oneshot code,
> >  	 * otherwise we might deadlock vs. xtime_lock.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (tick_check_oneshot_change(!hrtimer_is_hres_enabled())) {
> > -		hrtimer_switch_to_hres();
> > +	if (tick_check_oneshot_change()) {
> > +		if (hrtimer_is_hres_enabled())
> > +			hrtimer_switch_to_hres();
> > +		else
> > +			tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz();
>
> hrtimers have no business with tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz(),
> really. That's a strict tick/nohz specific thing. hrtimers do not care
> about NOHZ much. They care about whether they can switch to high
> resolution mode.

OK, lets forget this patch then.

But note that the comment above the tick_check_oneshot_change() says
"switch to highres and / or nohz mode".

Thanks,

Oleg.