linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of realtime inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:35:34 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
 david@...morbit.com, chandanbabu@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
 willy@...radead.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
 yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of
 realtime inode

On 2024/5/31 21:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:52:04PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> +	if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
>> +		first_unmap_block = xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx(mp, first_unmap_block);
> 
> Given that first_unmap_block is a xfs_fileoff_t and not a xfs_rtblock_t,
> this looks a bit confusing.  I'd suggest to just open code the
> arithmetics in xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx.  For future proofing my also
> use xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize() as in the hunk below instead of hard
> coding the rtextsize.  I.e.:
> 
> 	first_unmap_block = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp,
> 		roundup_64(new_size, xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip)));
> 
Sure, makes sense to me.

Thanks,
Yi.