[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67a811e0-6723-3bb6-5f74-a66610b884a0@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:35:34 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com, chandanbabu@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
willy@...radead.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of
realtime inode
On 2024/5/31 21:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:52:04PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> + if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
>> + first_unmap_block = xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx(mp, first_unmap_block);
>
> Given that first_unmap_block is a xfs_fileoff_t and not a xfs_rtblock_t,
> this looks a bit confusing. I'd suggest to just open code the
> arithmetics in xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx. For future proofing my also
> use xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize() as in the hunk below instead of hard
> coding the rtextsize. I.e.:
>
> first_unmap_block = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp,
> roundup_64(new_size, xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip)));
>
Sure, makes sense to me.
Thanks,
Yi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists