[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240603155810.GA509311-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:58:10 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Christopher Cordahi <christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: gpio: Add 'transition-delay-us'
property
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:13:37PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2024-05-29 at 11:17, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
> > I2C MUXes described by the i2c-gpio-mux sometimes need a significant
> > amount of time to switch from a bus to another. When a new bus is
> > selected, the first I2C transfer can fail if it occurs too early. There
> > is no way to describe this transition delay that has to be waited before
> > starting the first I2C transfer.
> >
> > Add a 'transition-delay-us' property that indicates the delay to be
> > respected before doing the first i2c transfer.
>
> The io-channel-mux has a property with very similar intent named
> settle-time-us [1]. I think we should use the same name here.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/multiplexer/io-channel-mux.yaml
Agreed. I knew we had something and went looking... I only checked the
base mux and i2c mux bindings.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists