[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96216e54-ba8f-4fd7-b95a-13477c143575@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:09:53 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/lib.mk: handle both LLVM=1 and CC=clang
builds
On 6/3/24 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:37:50AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> The kselftests may be built in a couple different ways:
>> make LLVM=1
>> make CC=clang
>>
>> In order to handle both cases, set LLVM=1 if CC=clang. That way,the rest
>> of lib.mk, and any Makefiles that include lib.mk, can base decisions
>> solely on whether or not LLVM is set.
>
> ICBW but I believe there are still some architectures with clang but not
> lld support where there's a use case for using CC=clang.
I'm inclined to wait for those to make themselves known... :)
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists