linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv11 09/19] x86/tdx: Account shared memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fd2c15b-5bd9-4e7e-8da0-4ca2c89b38f9@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:08:25 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
 Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
 Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
 Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, "Kalra, Ashish"
 <ashish.kalra@....com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
 Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Tao Liu <ltao@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 09/19] x86/tdx: Account shared memory

On 5/28/24 02:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Keep track of the number of shared pages. This will allow for 
> cross-checking against the shared information in the direct mapping
> and reporting if the shared bit is lost.

It's probably also worth mentioning that conversions are slow and
relatively rare and even though a global atomic isn't really scalable,
it also isn't worth doing anything fancier.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> index 26fa47db5782..979891e97d83 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>  
>  #define TDREPORT_SUBTYPE_0	0
>  
> +static atomic_long_t nr_shared;

Doesn't this technically need to be:

	static atomic_long_t nr_shared = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);

?  I thought we had some architectures where the 0 logical value wasn't
actually all 0's.