[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsSOWV9SRK1VUJiQfavEM1hL0PapxUBG6CNeD+Q=0qPT5ZnSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 18:45:19 +0200
From: Barnabás Czémán <trabarni@...il.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniil Titov <daniilt971@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: Add support for Adreno 505 GPU
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:27 PM Barnabás Czémán <trabarni@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:55 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/4/24 02:20, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
> > > From: Daniil Titov <daniilt971@...il.com>
> > >
> > > This GPU is found on SoCs such as MSM8937 (450 MHz), MSM8940 (475 MHz),
> > > SDM439 (650 MHz).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniil Titov <daniilt971@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <trabarni@...il.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > This all looks very good, just a nit
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Increase inactive period to 250 to avoid bouncing
> > > + * the GDSC which appears to make it grumpy
> > > + */
> > > + .inactive_period = 250,
> >
> > Are you sure this is actually necessary?
> Every A5XX GPU is using the same value, but i have never tried with
> DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD.
This was the original patch
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180507224750.9383-1-jcrouse@codeaurora.org/
where the inactive period was increased for a530. I cannot test
suspend on msm8937 yet.
I can check on msm8953 with a506 maybe if a506 works fine with
DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD
then a505 would be fine with it also.
>
> >
> > Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists