[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABzRoybRNbCQsz0PYUwEWWzUvR4FRcU3zp2Rzz9Fd4w3sK9hvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:56:58 +0800
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
To: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, Henry Huang <henry.hj@...group.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Sudarshan Rajagopalan <quic_sudaraja@...cinc.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>, "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mm: multi-gen LRU: ignore non-leaf pmd_young for force_scan=true
Hi Yuanchu,
Just a few nits below ;)
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:06 AM Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> When non-leaf pmd accessed bits are available, MGLRU page table walks
> can clear the non-leaf pmd accessed bit and ignore the accessed bit on
> the pte if it's on a different node, skipping a generation update as
> well. If another scan occurrs on the same node as said skipped pte.
s/occurrs/occurs
> the non-leaf pmd accessed bit might remain cleared and the pte accessed
> bits won't be checked. While this is sufficient for reclaim-driven
> aging, where the goal is to select a reasonably cold page, the access
> can be missed when aging proactively for workingset estimation of a of a
s/of a of a/of a
> node/memcg.
>
> In more detail, get_pfn_folio returns NULL if the folio's nid != node
> under scanning, so the page table walk skips processing of said pte. Now
> the pmd_young flag on this pmd is cleared, and if none of the pte's are
> accessed before another scan occurrs on the folio's node, the pmd_young
s/occurrs/occurs
Thanks,
Lance
> check fails and the pte accessed bit is skipped.
>
> Since force_scan disables various other optimizations, we check
> force_scan to ignore the non-leaf pmd accessed bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d55e8d07ffc4..73f3718b33f7 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static void walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>
> walk->mm_stats[MM_NONLEAF_TOTAL]++;
>
> - if (should_clear_pmd_young()) {
> + if (!walk->force_scan && should_clear_pmd_young()) {
> if (!pmd_young(val))
> continue;
>
> --
> 2.45.1.467.gbab1589fc0-goog
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists