linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 09/19] x86: Secure Launch kernel late boot stub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 22:59:18 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Ross Philipson" <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
 <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
 <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
 <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, <peterhuewe@....de>,
 <jgg@...pe.ca>, <luto@...capital.net>, <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <corbet@....net>,
 <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
 <kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com>, <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
 <trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/19] x86: Secure Launch kernel late boot stub

On Fri May 31, 2024 at 4:03 AM EEST, Ross Philipson wrote:
> The routine slaunch_setup is called out of the x86 specific setup_arch()
> routine during early kernel boot. After determining what platform is
> present, various operations specific to that platform occur. This
> includes finalizing setting for the platform late launch and verifying
> that memory protections are in place.
>
> For TXT, this code also reserves the original compressed kernel setup
> area where the APs were left looping so that this memory cannot be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile   |   1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c    |   3 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/slaunch.c  | 525 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c |   4 +
>  4 files changed, 533 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/slaunch.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index 5d128167e2e2..b35ca99ab0a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32)		+= tls.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)	+= tls.o
>  obj-y				+= step.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TXT)		+= tboot.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SECURE_LAUNCH)	+= slaunch.o

Hmm... should that be CONFIG_X86_SECURE_LAUNCH?

Just asking...

BR, Jarkko