[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <282fddde-d156-4bd3-906b-0318d0a3746d@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:14:38 -0700
From: ross.philipson@...cle.com
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
luto@...capital.net, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com, ross.philipson@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 16/19] tpm: Add ability to set the preferred locality
the TPM chip uses
On 6/4/24 1:27 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri May 31, 2024 at 4:03 AM EEST, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> Curently the locality is hard coded to 0 but for DRTM support, access
>> is needed to localities 1 through 4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/tpm.h | 4 ++++
>> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> index 854546000c92..73eac54d61fb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> if (!chip->ops->request_locality)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - rc = chip->ops->request_locality(chip, 0);
>> + rc = chip->ops->request_locality(chip, chip->pref_locality);
>> if (rc < 0)
>> return rc;
>>
>> @@ -143,6 +143,27 @@ void tpm_chip_stop(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_stop);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * tpm_chip_preferred_locality() - set the TPM chip preferred locality to open
>> + * @chip: a TPM chip to use
>> + * @locality: the preferred locality
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * true - Preferred locality set
>> + * * false - Invalid locality specified
>> + */
>> +bool tpm_chip_preferred_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int locality)
>> +{
>> + if (locality < 0 || locality >=TPM_MAX_LOCALITY)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
>> + chip->pref_locality = locality;
>> + mutex_unlock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_preferred_locality);
>> +
>> /**
>> * tpm_try_get_ops() - Get a ref to the tpm_chip
>> * @chip: Chip to ref
>> @@ -374,6 +395,7 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>> }
>>
>> chip->locality = -1;
>> + chip->pref_locality = 0;
>> return chip;
>>
>> out:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> index 5da134f12c9a..35f14ccecf0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> @@ -274,6 +274,21 @@ int tpm_is_tpm2(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_is_tpm2);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * tpm_preferred_locality() - set the TPM chip preferred locality to open
>> + * @chip: a TPM chip to use
>> + * @locality: the preferred locality
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * true - Preferred locality set
>> + * * false - Invalid locality specified
>> + */
>> +bool tpm_preferred_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int locality)
>> +{
>> + return tpm_chip_preferred_locality(chip, locality);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_preferred_locality);
>
> What good does this extra wrapping do?
>
> tpm_set_default_locality() and default_locality would make so much more
> sense in any case.
Are you mainly just talking about my naming choices here and in the
follow-on response? Can you clarify what you are requesting?
Thanks
Ross
>
> BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists