linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: arm64: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADrL8HV4SZ9BEQg1j3ojG-v5umL_d3sa4e1k2vMQCMmBEgeFpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:20:20 -0700
From: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>, 
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, 
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, 
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, 
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, 
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, 
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: arm64: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:18 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:11:33PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 06:05:09PM +0000, James Houghton wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > index 9e2bbee77491..eabb07c66a07 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > @@ -1319,10 +1319,8 @@ static int stage2_age_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > >     data->young = true;
> > >
> > >     /*
> > > -    * stage2_age_walker() is always called while holding the MMU lock for
> > > -    * write, so this will always succeed. Nonetheless, this deliberately
> > > -    * follows the race detection pattern of the other stage-2 walkers in
> > > -    * case the locking mechanics of the MMU notifiers is ever changed.
> > > +    * This walk may not be exclusive; the PTE is permitted to change
> > > +    * from under us.
> > >      */
> > >     if (data->mkold && !stage2_try_set_pte(ctx, new))
> > >             return -EAGAIN;
> >
> > It is probably worth mentioning that if there was a race to update the
> > PTE then the GFN is most likely young, so failing to clear AF probably
> > isn't even consequential.

Thanks Oliver.

>
> Oh, and the WARN_ON() in kvm_pgtable_stage2_test_clear_young() is bogus
> now. Maybe demote it to:
>
>   r = kvm_pgtable_walk(...);
>   WARN_ON_ONCE(r && r != -EAGAIN);

Oh, indeed, thank you. Just to make sure -- does it make sense to
retry the cmpxchg if it fails? For example, the way I have it now for
x86[1], we retry the cmpxchg if the spte is still a leaf, otherwise we
move on to the next one having done nothing. Does something like that
make sense for arm64?

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240529180510.2295118-6-jthoughton@google.com/