linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] crypto: tpm2_key: Introduce a TPM2 key type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D1RL9GZKU6Y3.2HFU56T053FQB@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:33:32 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Herbert Xu"
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
 <Andreas.Fuchs@...ineon.com>, "James Prestwood" <prestwoj@...il.com>,
 "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>, "Eric Biggers"
 <ebiggers@...nel.org>, "James Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Lennart Poettering" <lennart@...ttering.net>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, "open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Mimi
 Zohar" <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Paul
 Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>, "James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E.
 Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
 <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] crypto: tpm2_key: Introduce a TPM2 key type

On Tue Jun 4, 2024 at 9:41 PM EEST, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/24 13:23, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri May 31, 2024 at 3:35 AM EEST, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>
>
> >>>    
> >>> -	rc = tpm2_key_decode(payload, options, &blob);
> >>> -	if (rc) {
> >>> -		/* old form */
> >>> +	key = tpm2_key_decode(payload->blob, payload->blob_len);
> >>> +	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> >>> +		/* Get the error code and reset the pointer to the key: */
> >>> +		rc = PTR_ERR(key);
> >>> +		key = NULL;
> >>> +
> >>> +		if (rc == -ENOMEM)
> >>> +			return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> +		/* A sanity check, as only -EBADMSG or -ENOMEM are expected: */
> >>> +		if (rc != -EBADMSG)
> >>> +			pr_err("tpm2_key_decode(): spurious error code %d\n", rc);
> >>
> >> tpm2_key_decode seems simple enough that it only returns key, -ENOMEM or
> >> EBADMSG.
> > 
> > So what is your suggestion here?
>
> You can remove the check resuling in pr_err().

OK, I think so too. Just had to (sanity) check.

>
> > 
> > The reasoning here is that asymmetric keys use -EBADMSG not only as
> > error but also iterator, when probing which can load a specific key.
> > 

BR, Jarkko