linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/lib.mk: handle both LLVM=1 and CC=clang builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c57be33-77b8-419b-a708-e99aa9b44395@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 21:55:14 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
 Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
 sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/lib.mk: handle both LLVM=1 and CC=clang
 builds

On 6/3/24 3:47 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:32:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:37:50AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>>> The kselftests may be built in a couple different ways:
>>>      make LLVM=1
>>>      make CC=clang
>>>
>>> In order to handle both cases, set LLVM=1 if CC=clang. That way,the rest
>>> of lib.mk, and any Makefiles that include lib.mk, can base decisions
>>> solely on whether or not LLVM is set.
>>
>> ICBW but I believe there are still some architectures with clang but not
>> lld support where there's a use case for using CC=clang.
> 
> Does CC=clang even work for the selftests? lib.mk here uses 'CC :=' so
> won't CC=clang get overridden to CC=$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc?
> 

I received a report that someone (I forget who or what) was definitely
attempting to just set CC=clang. But yes, it definitely doesn't work
properly for CROSS_COMPILE.

And the more we talk it through, the less I like this direction that
I went off on. Let's just drop this patch and instead consider moving
kselftest builds closer to kbuild, instead of making it more different.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA