[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be478487-8509-4bfe-9354-c1c3f6246489@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:38:01 +0800
From: YangYang <yang.yang@...o.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sbitmap: fix io hung due to race on
sbitmap_word::cleared
On 2024/6/4 11:25, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 11:12 AM Yang Yang <yang.yang@...o.com> wrote:
>>
>> Configuration for sbq:
>> depth=64, wake_batch=6, shift=6, map_nr=1
>>
>> 1. There are 64 requests in progress:
>> map->word = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>> 2. After all the 64 requests complete, and no more requests come:
>> map->word = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, map->cleared = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>> 3. Now two tasks try to allocate requests:
>> T1: T2:
>> __blk_mq_get_tag .
>> __sbitmap_queue_get .
>> sbitmap_get .
>> sbitmap_find_bit .
>> sbitmap_find_bit_in_word .
>> __sbitmap_get_word -> nr=-1 __blk_mq_get_tag
>> sbitmap_deferred_clear __sbitmap_queue_get
>> /* map->cleared=0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF */ sbitmap_find_bit
>> if (!READ_ONCE(map->cleared)) sbitmap_find_bit_in_word
>> return false; __sbitmap_get_word -> nr=-1
>> mask = xchg(&map->cleared, 0) sbitmap_deferred_clear
>> atomic_long_andnot() /* map->cleared=0 */
>> if (!(map->cleared))
>> return false;
>> /*
>> * map->cleared is cleared by T1
>> * T2 fail to acquire the tag
>> */
>>
>> 4. T2 is the sole tag waiter. When T1 puts the tag, T2 cannot be woken
>> up due to the wake_batch being set at 6. If no more requests come, T1
>> will wait here indefinitely.
>>
>> To fix this issue, simply revert commit 661d4f55a794 ("sbitmap:
>> remove swap_lock"), which causes this issue.
>
> I'd suggest to add the following words in commit log:
>
> Check on ->cleared and update on both ->cleared and ->word need to be
> done atomically, and using spinlock could be the simplest solution.
Thank you. I will handle this in V3.
>
> Otherwise, the patch looks fine for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists