lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:57:44 +0000
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:
> 
> > Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> >> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> >> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> >>
> >>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> >>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >>
> >> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> >> self explaining.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> 
> BTW Ping, you can also take it directly to your tree if you want. But if you
> want me to take the patch, then please assign it to me on patchwork (ie.
> change 'Delegate to' to 'kvalo'). My preference is to take it to your
> tree, smaller risk of concflicts that way, but up to you.

I will take it to my tree. 

Ping-Ke


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ