linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 5/6] wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1483c59d26174defb6fb0886a7375ef0@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:57:44 +0000
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:
> 
> > Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> >> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> >> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> >>
> >>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> >>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >>
> >> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> >> self explaining.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> 
> BTW Ping, you can also take it directly to your tree if you want. But if you
> want me to take the patch, then please assign it to me on patchwork (ie.
> change 'Delegate to' to 'kvalo'). My preference is to take it to your
> tree, smaller risk of concflicts that way, but up to you.

I will take it to my tree. 

Ping-Ke