[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b61ee830-0833-e8ca-4c23-f83823b04d2e@126.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:18:57 +0800
From: yangge1116 <yangge1116@....com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liuzixing@...on.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: don't check page lru flag before draining it
在 2024/6/4 下午4:56, Baolin Wang 写道:
>
>
> On 2024/6/4 16:09, yangge1116@....com wrote:
>> From: yangge <yangge1116@....com>
>>
>> If a page is added in pagevec, its ref count increases one, remove
>> the page from pagevec decreases one. Page migration requires the
>> page is not referrened by others except page mapping. Before
>> migrating a page, we should try to drain the page from pagevec in
>> case the page is in it, however, folio_test_lru() is not sufficient
>> to tell whether the page is in pagevec or not, if the page is in
>> pagevec, the migration will fail.
>>
>> Remove the condition and drain lru once to ensure the page is not
>> referrenced by pagevec.
>
> This looks sane to me and seems a simple way to fix.
>
>> Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge1116@....com>
>> ---
>> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>> index ca0f5ce..890dcbc 100644
>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -2411,7 +2411,7 @@ static unsigned long
>> collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(
>> continue;
>> }
>> - if (!folio_test_lru(folio) && drain_allow) {
>> + if (drain_allow) {
>> lru_add_drain_all();
>> drain_allow = false;
>> }
>
> You should rebase your code on the latest mm-unstable branch, as
> collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages() in the upstream has been replaced
> with collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios().
Ok, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists