linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:07:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash
 address/size-cells

On 05/04/2024 14:30, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
>> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
>> warnings:
>>
>>    socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@...pi@...d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 --
>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 {
>>   &qspi {
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   	flash@0 {
>> -		#address-cells = <1>;
>> -		#size-cells = <1>;
>>   		compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
>>   		reg = <0>;
>>   		spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
> 
> All patches applied!

This was two months ago, so it should reach v6.10-rc1. It is neither in
v6.10-rc1 nor in linux-next.

Are you sure you applied this?

Are your trees in linux-next?

Best regards,
Krzysztof