lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 18:26:11 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, alexs@...nel.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com,
 willy@...radead.org, aarcange@...hat.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
 hughd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] mm/ksm: reduce the flush action for ksm merging
 page



On 6/4/24 4:07 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.06.24 06:24, alexs@...nel.org wrote:
>> From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <alexs@...nel.org>
>>
>> We can put off the flush action util a merging is realy coming. That
>> could reduce some unmerge page flushing.
>> BTW, flushing only do at arm, mips and few other archs.
>>
> 
> I'm no expert on that flushing, but I thought we would have to do the flushing before accessing page content -- before calculating the checksum etc.
> 
> Now you would only do it before the pages_identical() check, but not when calculating the checksum.
> 

Hi David,

Thanks a lot for comments!

If calc_checksum() is wrong before pages_idential(), (that's just after page was write_protected, that's a real guarantee for page context secured) pages_identical could recheck and make thing right. 

And as to 2 flush functions here, I didn't see the guarantee for other writer from any other place. So maybe we should remove these flush action?

Thanks
Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ