linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: set minItems for interrupt-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zl7xw4ER-BBvcuct@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:51:47 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: set minItems for
 interrupt-names

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/05/2024 16:45, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > 
> > There's a set of compatibles for which we set a strict list of 5 interrupt
> > names even though minItems for the interrupts property is 4. One of the
> > USB controllers on sa8775p only consumes 4 interrupts which leads to
> > dtbs_check errors. Make the last entry optional by setting minItems to 4.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Can you also fix other cases? I found there at least two other. I missed
> that during review... or maybe we discussed it? I remember that commit
> was a pain :/

Yes, please make sure to fix those two remaining instances at the same
time.
 
> But be sure that this is what we actually want. Maybe intention was to
> have fixed number of interrupts (so no minItems in interrupts)?

I'm pretty sure the intention was to keep the SuperSpeed interrupts
optional.

Johan