[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240604121055.lztvn2wu62qqrla6@maximize>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:10:55 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
CC: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <m.nirmaladevi@...s.com>,
<bhargav.r@...s.com>, <lee@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
<u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for
TPS65224 and TPS6594
On 19:01-20240603, Thomas Richard wrote:
> The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for
> the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated
> one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array.
>
> If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could
> be used.
>
> Fix the values used in the calculation for TPS6594 and TPS65224.
>
> Fixes: 00c826525fba (regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC regulators)
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
> ---
Thanks a ton for fixing this - this solved a bunch of random regressions
we were tracking:
am62axx_sk, am69_sk, j721e-idk, j721s2-evm in addition to J7200 evm as
well.
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
This was definitely a 6.10 regression, could we fast track it in?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists