[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240604121242.2661244-1-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 20:12:43 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk,
asml.silence@...il.com,
nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
morbo@...gle.com,
justinstitt@...gle.com
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/io-wq: avoid garbge value of 'match' in io_wq_enqueue()
Clang static checker (scan-build) warning:
o_uring/io-wq.c:line 1051, column 3
The expression is an uninitialized value. The computed value will
also be garbage.
'match.nr_pending' is used in io_acct_cancel_pending_work(), but it is
not initialized. Change the order of assignment for 'match' to fix
this problem.
Fixes: 42abc95f05bf ("io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
io_uring/io-wq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index d1c47a9d9215..7d3316fe9bfc 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -927,7 +927,11 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
unsigned long work_flags = work->flags;
- struct io_cb_cancel_data match;
+ struct io_cb_cancel_data match = {
+ .fn = io_wq_work_match_item,
+ .data = work,
+ .cancel_all = false,
+ };
bool do_create;
/*
@@ -965,10 +969,6 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
raw_spin_unlock(&wq->lock);
/* fatal condition, failed to create the first worker */
- match.fn = io_wq_work_match_item,
- match.data = work,
- match.cancel_all = false,
-
io_acct_cancel_pending_work(wq, acct, &match);
}
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists