[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zl8GoRoY9lXRtg2R@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:20:49 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Make the PCIe 6a PHY
support 4 lanes mode
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 02:00:10PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/3/24 14:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > As I just mentioned in my reply on the PHY patch, this does not seem to
> > work on the CRD were the link still come up as 2-lane (also with the
> > clocks fixed):
> >
> > qcom-pcie 1bf8000.pci: PCIe Gen.4 x2 link up
> >
> > So something appears to be wrong here or in the PHY changes.
>
> Is the device on the other end x4-capable? Or does it not matter in
> this log line?
Yes, of course. It's the CRD as I wrote above, and you can tell from
other log entries:
pci 0007:01:00.0: 31.506 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0007:00:00.0 (capable of 63.012 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x4 link)
lspci and what Windows reports.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists