[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zl8IAqTehDrVUJ4k@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:26:42 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy:
Document the X1E80100 QMP PCIe PHY Gen4 x4
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/06/2024 13:17, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 03/06/2024 14:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 07:06:44PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>>> The PCIe 6th instance from X1E80100 can be used in both 4-lane mode or
> >>>
> >>> nit: s/PCIe 6th/sixth PCIe/
> >>> nit: s/from/on/
> >>> nit: s/both/either/
> >>
> >> That's really nit-picking and not helpful in getting things merged.
> >
> > Writing proper commit messages with correct grammar is in no way to be
> > asking too much (especially from experienced kernel devs).
>
> Well, many of us are not native English speakers, so when the commit msg
> is 100% understandable, pointing out grammar mistakes or style
> (6th->sixth) issues is nit-picking and is asking for unnecessary work.
Well I did use a "nit:" prefix for a reason. And I hope people are still
interested in improving their English even if it's not their first
language.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists