lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171750701353.925406.16431237983148253122.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2024 16:16:57 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
	Narasimhan V <Narasimhan.V@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node()

From: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:10:05 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> memblock_set_node() warns about using MAX_NUMNODES, see
> 
>   e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")
> 
> for details.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to fixes branch of memblock.git tree, thanks!

[1/1] x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node()
      commit: c55f3cc2d9f241d6e45336fd48dafa755c012297

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock
branch: fixes

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ