linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] hwmon: (k10temp) Check return value of amd_smn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240605161236.GIZmCOdP-CRPJ8-3sY@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 18:12:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, x86@...nel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] hwmon: (k10temp) Check return value of
 amd_smn_read()

On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 09:41:51AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> I agree that patches 1-3 are not stable-worthy on their own. But I think
> patch 4 is, and it requires 1-3 to avoid build errors.

Which of the rules in the first section of
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst apply for patch 4?

Because I don't see it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette