[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmCa6UXON7bBDLwA@andrea>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 19:05:45 +0200
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, paulmck@...nel.org, akiyks@...il.com,
dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com,
jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Document herd7 (internal)
representation
> > > A patch to fix the problem and reorganize the code a bit for greater
> > > readability is below. I'd appreciate it if people could try it out on
> > > various locking litmus tests in our archives.
> >
> > Thanks for the quick solution, Alan. The results from our archives look
> > good.
>
> Here's a much smaller patch, suitable for the -stable kernels. It fixes
> the bug without doing the larger code reorganization (which will go into
> a separate patch). Can you test this one?
Testing in progress..., first results are good.
(+1 on splitting the patches)
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists