linux-kernel - Re: x86: WARNING: at mm/memblock.c:1339 memblock_set_node - Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <315d6873-d618-4126-b67a-de62502d7ee2@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:07:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, jbeulich@...e.com,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: x86: WARNING: at mm/memblock.c:1339 memblock_set_node - Usage of
 MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 07:19:21PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> The following kernel warnings are noticed on x86 devices while booting
> the Linux next-20240603 tag and looks like it is expected to warn users to
> use NUMA_NO_NODE instead.
> 
> Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead
> 
> The following config is enabled
> CONFIG_NUMA=y

I am seeing this as well.  Is the following commit premature?

e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")

Maybe old ACPI tables and device trees need to catch up?

Left to myself, I would simply remove the WARN_ON_ONCE() from the above
commit, but I would guess that there is a better way.

							Thanx, Paul

> Boot log:
> --------
> [    0.008547] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    0.008547] Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead
> [    0.008553] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/memblock.c:1339
> memblock_set_node+0xed/0x100
> [    0.008559] Modules linked in:
> [    0.008561] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
> 6.10.0-rc1-next-20240603 #1
> [    0.008563] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
> 2.7 12/07/2021
> [    0.008564] RIP: 0010:memblock_set_node+0xed/0x100
> [    0.008567] Code: ea ea ff 00 74 0b 41 bc ff ff ff ff e9 6c ff ff
> ff 48 89 75 d0 c6 05 5e ea ea ff 01 90 48 c7 c7 c8 e1 c7 a0 e8 d4 36
> df fd 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 75 d0 eb d2 e8 74 bb f3 fe 0f 1f 40 00 90
> 90 90
> [    0.008568] RSP: 0000:ffffffffa1003de0 EFLAGS: 00010086 ORIG_RAX:
> 0000000000000000
> [    0.008570] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffa149b510 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [    0.008572] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffdfff RDI: 00000000ffffdfff
> [    0.008572] RBP: ffffffffa1003e10 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffffa1003b90
> [    0.008573] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffffa1079440 R12: 0000000000000040
> [    0.008574] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000008ad25c18 R15: 0000000000014770
> [    0.008575] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffffa135e000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    0.008577] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [    0.008578] CR2: ffff9ac23fe01000 CR3: 00000003ff246000 CR4: 00000000000200f0
> [    0.008579] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [    0.008579] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [    0.008580] Call Trace:
> [    0.008581]  <TASK>
> [    0.008582]  ? show_regs+0x68/0x80
> [    0.008586]  ? __warn+0x91/0x140
> [    0.008589]  ? memblock_set_node+0xed/0x100
> [    0.008591]  ? report_bug+0x175/0x1a0
> [    0.008594]  ? fixup_exception+0x2b/0x2f0
> [    0.008597]  ? early_fixup_exception+0xb3/0xd0
> [    0.008600]  ? do_early_exception+0x1f/0x60
> [    0.008603]  ? early_idt_handler_common+0x2f/0x40
> [    0.008606]  ? memblock_set_node+0xed/0x100
> [    0.008609]  ? __pfx_x86_acpi_numa_init+0x10/0x10
> [    0.008612]  numa_init+0x8b/0x610
> [    0.008615]  ? topo_register_apic+0x3a/0x130
> [    0.008617]  x86_numa_init+0x23/0x70
> [    0.008620]  initmem_init+0x12/0x20
> [    0.008622]  setup_arch+0x8a3/0xd60
> [    0.008624]  ? _printk+0x64/0x80
> [    0.008628]  start_kernel+0x76/0x810
> [    0.008630]  x86_64_start_reservations+0x1c/0x30
> [    0.008632]  x86_64_start_kernel+0xca/0xe0
> [    0.008634]  common_startup_64+0x12c/0x138
> [    0.008637]  </TASK>
> [    0.008638] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> metadata:
>  git_ref: master
>  git_describe: next-20240603
>  git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next
> 
> Links:
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240603/testrun/24170391/suite/log-parser-boot/tests/
>  - https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2hM1TaqYoxFAhzHCIRxz84OeUaj
>  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2hM1QI6QEe9bjg1sQrFs41ZSYmk
>  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2hM1QI6QEe9bjg1sQrFs41ZSYmk/config
> 
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org