[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6660ec883d31c_1ad63294f4@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:54:00 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <peterx@...hat.com>, "Dan
Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Pasha Tatashin
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_table_check: Fix crash on ZONE_DEVICE
[ add Alistair ]
Peter Xu wrote:
> Not all pages may apply to pgtable check. One example is ZONE_DEVICE
> pages: they map PFNs directly, and they don't allocate page_ext at all even
> if there's struct page around. One may reference devm_memremap_pages().
>
> When both ZONE_DEVICE and page-table-check enabled, then try to map some
> dax memories, one can trigger kernel bug constantly now when the kernel was
> trying to inject some pfn maps on the dax device:
>
> kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:55!
>
> While it's pretty legal to use set_pxx_at() for ZONE_DEVICE pages for page
> fault resolutions, skip all the checks if page_ext doesn't even exist in
> pgtable checker, which applies to ZONE_DEVICE but maybe more.
This looks correct to me, and needed in the near term. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
In the long term, the page_ext check may not be needed. I.e. the reason
I added Alistair was in case his work to make DAX pages behave like
typical pages for reference counting would also make them behave the
same for the presence of page_ext.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists