linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: renesas: Add RZ/V2H(P) CPG helper driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXk+u0J9GQrGHa_yMgBtkrhCNtGXdWmfsmVt3UskNMMug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:05:48 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: renesas: Add RZ/V2H(P) CPG helper driver

Hii Prabhakar,

Thanks for your patch!

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:29 AM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Add RZ/V2H(P) CPG helper driver.

Drop "helper"?

> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/r9a09g057-cpg.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@

> +static int pll_clk1_offset[] = { -EINVAL, -EINVAL, -EINVAL, 0x64, -EINVAL,
> +                              -EINVAL, 0xC4, -EINVAL, -EINVAL, 0x124, 0x144 };
> +static int pll_clk2_offset[] = { -EINVAL, -EINVAL, -EINVAL, 0x68, -EINVAL,
> +                              -EINVAL, 0xC8, -EINVAL, -EINVAL, 0x128, 0x148 };

const (both)

Both arrays are very similar: all valid values differ by an offset of 4.
If that is universal, perhaps the second one can be dropped, and
the offset can be handled by the user?

> +static struct rzv2h_mod_clk r9a09g057_mod_clks[] = {

const

> +       DEF_MOD("scif_0_clk_pck",               R9A09G057_SCIF_0_CLK_PCK, CLK_PLLCM33_DIV16,
> +                                               0x620, 15, 0x810, 15),
> +};
> +
> +static struct rzv2h_reset r9a09g057_resets[] = {

const

> +       DEF_RST(R9A09G057_SCIF_0_RST_SYSTEM_N,          0x924,  5, 0xA10, 6),
> +};


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds