lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240604172305.v3.21.I20f82e9dd1597a14ae37a64c6b8275add60fbdb1@changeid>
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2024 17:23:07 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/24] drm/panel: raydium-rm67191: Stop tracking enabled

As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.

The conversion of the rm67191 panel driver follows many of the other
panel drivers but has a few differences that need to be called out.

Like in commit 1e0465eb16a4 ("drm/panel: otm8009a: Don't double check
prepared/enabled"), this panel also uses the "prepared" flag to
prevent the backlight functions from running when the panel is powered
off. This is probably not the safest thing to do but the old behavior
was preserved. See the discussion in the otm8009a patch. Because of
this, I've left the driver tracking "prepared" but removed its
tracking of "enabled".

NOTE: as part of this, transition the panel's direct calls to its
disable/unprepare functions in shutdown to call through DRM panel.

Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---

(no changes since v2)

Changes in v2:
- Split removal of prepared/enabled from handling of remove/shutdown.

 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm67191.c | 21 ++-----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm67191.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm67191.c
index dbb1ed4efbed..fa9bf89d3bb5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm67191.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm67191.c
@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ struct rad_panel {
 	unsigned int num_supplies;
 
 	bool prepared;
-	bool enabled;
 };
 
 static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
@@ -267,9 +266,6 @@ static int rad_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	struct rad_panel *rad = to_rad_panel(panel);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (rad->prepared)
-		return 0;
-
 	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(rad->num_supplies, rad->supplies);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -291,9 +287,6 @@ static int rad_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	struct rad_panel *rad = to_rad_panel(panel);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!rad->prepared)
-		return 0;
-
 	/*
 	 * Right after asserting the reset, we need to release it, so that the
 	 * touch driver can have an active connection with the touch controller
@@ -322,9 +315,6 @@ static int rad_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	int color_format = color_format_from_dsi_format(dsi->format);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (rad->enabled)
-		return 0;
-
 	dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
 
 	ret = rad_panel_push_cmd_list(dsi);
@@ -389,8 +379,6 @@ static int rad_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 
 	backlight_enable(rad->backlight);
 
-	rad->enabled = true;
-
 	return 0;
 
 fail:
@@ -406,9 +394,6 @@ static int rad_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!rad->enabled)
-		return 0;
-
 	dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
 
 	backlight_disable(rad->backlight);
@@ -429,8 +414,6 @@ static int rad_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	rad->enabled = false;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -633,8 +616,8 @@ static void rad_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 {
 	struct rad_panel *rad = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
 
-	rad_panel_disable(&rad->panel);
-	rad_panel_unprepare(&rad->panel);
+	drm_panel_disable(&rad->panel);
+	drm_panel_unprepare(&rad->panel);
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id rad_of_match[] = {
-- 
2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ