lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:09:14 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
	Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: delay recalced_mask and
 route_mask init

On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 07:10:19PM +0500, Dmitry Yashin wrote:
> For some SoC's like rk3308 additional runtime setup needed, so delay
> recalced_mask and route_mask init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>

This sounds like it needs a Fixes tag.  Should it be backported to
stable?

I understand that you only know that rk3308 is affected, and probably
you worry that other devices are as well?  Just do your best on trying
to figure out which is the first commit where this bug started to
matter.  Any information is better than no information.

The commit message should say what the bug looks like to the user.  Why
would a user want this patch?  I can probably figure it out from reading
the code, but I shouldn't have to.

regards,
dan carpenter



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ