[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240605094231.GR26599@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:42:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kprateek.nayak@....com,
wuyun.abel@...edance.com, tglx@...utronix.de, efault@....de,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Hongyan.Xia2@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote:
> ... thanks for the patch! The above seems to do it for me. I can see
> more reasonable energy use with the eevdf-complete series. Still a
> bit higher. Might be noise, we'll see.
W00t!!!
Let me write a decent Changelog and stuff it in the git tree along with
all the other bits.
Thanks for all the testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists