[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eea16e12-6e9d-4630-87e6-f44071ab1c4e@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:55:08 +0300
From: "Nemanov, Michael" <michael.nemanov@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Sabeeh Khan <sabeeh-khan@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] Add main.c
On 5/31/2024 4:50 PM, Nemanov, Michael wrote:
> On 5/22/2024 12:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:>
>>> +
>>> +static int cc33xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct cc33xx *cc;
>>> + struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
>>> + struct cc33xx_platdev_data *pdev_data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>>> + const char *nvs_name;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + cc33xx_debug(DEBUG_CC33xx, "Wireless Driver Version %s", DRV_VERSION);
>>
>> Drop
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (!pdev_data) {
>>> + cc33xx_error("can't access platform data");
>>
>> Do not use your own print code. Use standard dev_() calls. This applies
>> *everywhere*.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + cc33xx_debug(DEBUG_CC33xx, "WLAN CC33xx platform device probe done");
>>
>> Drop, tracing/sysfs gices you this. Do not print simple
>> success/entry/exit messages.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cc33xx_id_table);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver cc33xx_driver = {
>>> + .probe = cc33xx_probe,
>>> + .remove = cc33xx_remove,
>>> + .id_table = cc33xx_id_table,
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = "cc33xx_driver",
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +u32 cc33xx_debug_level = DEBUG_NO_DATAPATH;
>>>
>> Why this is global? Why u32? Why global variable is defined at the end
>> of the file?!?!
>
> cc33xx_debug_level together with cc33xx_debug/info/error() macros is how
> all traces were done in drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ (originally was
> wl1271_debug/info etc.)
> It enables / disables traces without rebuilding or even reloading which
> is very helpful for remote support. These macros map to dynamic_pr_debug
> / pr_debug. I saw similar wrappers in other wireless drivers (ath12k).
> This is also why there are plenty of cc33xx_debug() all over the code,
> most are silent by default.
Any more thoughts on debug traces? I'll remove all trivial function
entry / exit traces as Krzysztof requested. Is it OK to keep other
cc33xx_debug() calls which will be off by default?
Michael.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists