linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <879ee1b3-46eb-40c8-9b2a-3f215e527f53@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:54:13 +0200
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
 will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
 dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
 akiyks@...il.com, dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
 urezki@...il.com, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, frederic@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on
 operation in tools/...



Am 6/5/2024 um 6:25 AM schrieb Boqun Feng:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:04:09PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>> Herd7 transforms reads, writes, and read-modify-writes by eliminating
>> 'acquire tags from writes, 'release tags from reads, and 'acquire,
>> 'release, and 'mb tags from failed read-modify-writes. We emulate this
>> behavior by redefining Acquire, Release, and Mb sets in linux-kernel.bell
>> to explicitly exclude those combinations.
>>
>> Herd7 furthermore adds 'noreturn tag to certain reads. Currently herd7
>> does not allow specifying the 'noreturn tag manually, but such manual
>> declaration (e.g., through a syntax __atomic_op{noreturn}) would add
>> invalid 'noreturn tags to writes; in preparation, we already also exclude
>> this combination.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
>> index dba6b5b6dee0..2f49993644ed 100644
>> --- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
>> +++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
>> @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
>>   		'after-srcu-read-unlock (*smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock*)
>>   instructions F[Barriers]
>>   
>> +(* Remove impossible tags, such as Acquire on a store or failed RMW *)
> 
> This comment needs a bit help, "failed RMW"s still exist, they just
> don't provide ordering. How about:


Oh, I see how the comment can be misread. A smaller fix would be

"Acquire on a store or on a failed RMW"

but I actually like your longer explanation better, so I think I'll go 
with that.

> 
> (*
>   * Filter out syntactic annotations that don't provide the corresponding
>   * semantic ordering, such as Acquire on a store or Mb on a failed RMW.
>   *)
> 
> ?
> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
>> +let FailedRMW = RMW \ (domain(rmw) | range(rmw))
>> +let Acquire = Acquire \ W \ FailedRMW
>> +let Release = Release \ R \ FailedRMW
>> +let Mb = Mb \ FailedRMW
>> +let Noreturn = Noreturn \ W
>> +
>>   (* SRCU *)
>>   enum SRCU = 'srcu-lock || 'srcu-unlock || 'sync-srcu
>>   instructions SRCU[SRCU]
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>