linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:42:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, stsp2@...dex.ru, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, ryan.roberts@....com,
	suzuki.poulose@....com, Anshuman.Khandual@....com,
	DeepakKumar.Mishra@....com, AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@....com,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:53:27PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> On 6/7/24 18:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:53:19PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:

> > > + * Test describing a clear distinction between signal states - delivered and
> > > + * blocked, and their relation with ucontext.

> > This would be clearer if it said more positiviely what the relationship
> > between these things is actually expected to be and how they're tested.
> > Right now it's a bit hard to tell what the test is actually verifying.

> I thought I had described that quite well in the code comments.

> Anyways, I shall incorporate some detail into the initial test
> description too.

If the overview is confusing and people have to read the code to figure
out what it means then that's an issue...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)