[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240607-dealer-vertebrae-9b22db3dc43b@spud>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:50:24 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RESEND] dt-bindings: clock: rk3128: Drop
CLK_NR_CLKS
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Alex Bee wrote:
>
> Am 06.06.24 um 18:09 schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:00:46PM +0200, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > CLK_NR_CLKS should not be part of the binding. Let's drop it, since
> > > the kernel code no longer uses it either.
> > What about other operating systems etc, e.g. U-Boot or barebox?
> For u-boot: RK3128 hasn't been switched to OF_UPSTREAM yet and it still
> uses it's own (dated) copy of the dt-bindings headers [0] and besides this
> macro isn't used there. Barebox doesn't support RK3128 at all and I'm
> generally not aware of any other bootloader/OS does which does and
> especially none which uses this macro.
Okay, thanks for looking into it.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists