[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d6587a4-3e39-449b-a108-9f6893d4a405@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:54:36 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Maciej Wieczór-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Shuah
Khan" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/16] selftests/resctrl: Calculate resctrl FS derived
mem bw over sleep(1) only
Hi Ilpo,
On 6/7/24 5:53 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> For MBM/MBA tests, measure_vals() calls get_mem_bw_imc() that performs
> the measurement over a duration of sleep(1) call. The memory bandwidth
> numbers from IMC are derived over this duration. The resctrl FS derived
> memory bandwidth, however, is calculated inside measure_vals() and only
> takes delta between the previous value and the current one which
> besides the actual test, also samples inter-test noise.
>
> Rework the logic in measure_vals() and get_mem_bw_imc() such that the
> resctrl FS memory bandwidth section covers much shorter duration
> closely matching that of the IMC perf counters to improve measurement
> accuracy.
>
> For the second read after rewind() to return a fresh value, also
> newline has to be consumed by the fscanf().
>
> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
>
> v6:
> - Adjust closing/rollback of the IMC perf
> - Move the comment in measure_vals() to function level
> - Capitalize MBM
> - binded to -> bound to
This change does not match the patch.
> v5:
> - Open mem bw file once and use rewind()
> - Read \n from the mem bw file to allow rewind to return a new value.
> v4:
> - Open resctrl mem bw file (twice) beforehand to avoid opening it during
> the test
> v3:
> - Don't drop Return: entry from perf_open_imc_mem_bw() func comment
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 141 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> index f55f5989de72..1575c5c09ac7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> @@ -306,18 +306,13 @@ static void perf_close_imc_mem_bw(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * get_mem_bw_imc: Memory band width as reported by iMC counters
> - * @cpu_no: CPU number that the benchmark PID is binded to
> - * @bw_report: Bandwidth report type (reads, writes)
> - *
> - * Memory B/W utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated using
> - * iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
> + * perf_open_imc_mem_bw - Open perf fds for IMCs
> + * @cpu_no: CPU number that the benchmark PID is bounded to
"is bounded to" -> "is bound to"?
Just the one nitpick from me. The patch looks good to me. Thank you
very much.
| Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists